6/6 AP English Literature Prose Essay Example #4
This is a real prose essay written by an AP student (personal details removed) and scored 6/6 by our AI grader — one of many AP English Literature essay examples in our library.
The Prompt
The following question refers to Jamaica Kincaid’s “Girl,” published in 1978. In this story, a mother addresses her daughter by imparting expectations for proper behavior. Read the story carefully.
In a well-written essay, analyze how Kincaid uses literary elements and techniques to convey how social values and traditions shape the complex relationship between the mother and her daughter.
The Passage
The Essay
The first thing to do, crack the eggs. As the eggs cook on the pan, turn the heat from the stove on to medium. Wait until the egg whites are cooked, and then remove the eggs from the pan while the yolk is still runny. Cooking eggs to many is a self-explanatory process, but some people still need the instructions. These instructions help people control the outcome of what happens with the object, the eggs, but what happens when people apply this same logic elsewhere? What happens when people apply the “cookbook” style instructions to a person– something that is not an object and has a mind of its own? In the essay Girl by Jamaica Kincaid, this exact logic is tested. The mother gives her daughter the “cookbook” style instructions, but not how to cook eggs, rather how to live her life. Through the essay, Kincaid shows these instructions through her use of an active voice, bossy repetition, and an overwhelming sentence structure to demonstrate the broader idea that young girls have societal ideals imposed on them so drastically to the point where the girls are expected to conform and surrender their individuality, stripping away their identity and pushing them to find their worth in materialism. Ironically, these ideals are pushed so hard by the very people who are supposed to support originality, their mothers. One of the first noticeable choices Kincaid begins her essay with is her use of active voice. Rather than showing the daughter’s relationship with her mother through a conversation, she shows it through a list of instructions. These instructions can be inferred to be a compilation of separate conversations they’ve had in the past, all strung together. This highlights the tension with her mother and how she views the relationship that they have as one-sided and controlled. The story begins by saying, “Wash the white clothes on Monday and put them on the stone heap; wash the color clothes on Tuesday and put them on the clothesline to dry”. In this, there is a lack of personal emotion and creativity compared to what could have come from dialogue. Since this is from the daughter’s point of view, this showcases how the daughter believes that her mother does not hold emotion for her, rather she holds clear and blunt expectations of her. These expectations are that she is to live up to what society views a “good wife” as, not that she should be a child. These expectations, when forced onto any child, will not help better their life, rather bury their individuality and push them to conform to a robot. Another noticeable choice that the author deliberately makes is to use repetition of words. Repetition can imply that these words are something she has heard very often from her mother; the words stick with her. It can also highlight how these societal ideals of being a “perfect girl” or a “good wife” are repeated to her over and over again. One word that is repeated 14 times is the word “don’t”. That word alone can have a negative connotation as it means that someone is being instructed not to do something, but especially in this case as it means the daughter is being instructed not to make mistakes. Perfection is something that has been expected of women for centuries. In fact, this idea was even shown in the Bible in the book of Esther when Queen Vashti was removed from her position because she refused to flaunt her body to a group of men, likely when she had nothing on. The original reason why she became the queen was because she was deemed to be perfectly beautiful, but as soon as her personality began to develop and she set a boundary for herself, she was kicked out. Although lacking the nudity, the mother is implying these same ideals when she repeats “don’t”. Queen Vashti was not allowed to make the mistake of refusing to live up to her expectations as the beautiful queen, and the daughter’s mother is instructing her to not fail to live up to her expectation of being the –societally defined– perfect girl. From birth, mothers are tasked with being the ones who love their babies, especially their daughters due to their special connection of gender. With love comes embracing the natural qualities of a person. In this essay, her mother is not embracing her, but rather her mother is trying to change her to fit the standards of how society expects materialism from a girl– beauty, silence, gracefulness, and a lack of a desire to lead. Another noticeable literary element that Kincaid utilizes in this essay is overwhelming sentence structure. If this were to be read aloud, some of the lack of pauses would feel unnatural and make a reader feel like they needed to take a deep breath. Kincaid does this because it reflects how the daughter feels; the daughter feels like she needs space and time to breathe. Not just of her mother, but of all the instructions on how to live up to her expectations that she gives. In this essay, it is not grammatically incorrect, but rather instead of periods, semi-colons are used to break sentences. Additionally, many of the sentences have similar structures. Kincaid writes, “this is how you set a table for tea; this is how you set a table for dinner; this is how you set a table for dinner with an important guest; this is how you set a table for lunch; this is how you set a table for breakfast; this is how to behave in the presence of men who don’t know you very well” and she also writes, “this is how to make a bread pudding; this is how to make doukona; this is how to make pepper pot; this is how to make a good medicine for a cold; this is how to make a good medicine to throw away a child before it even becomes a child”. All of these sentences begin with the same word, they lack originality. There is a lack of originality not only in the word choice, but also in the simplicity of the sentences. There are not any “fancy” words, nor are there multiple verbs or multiple nouns, they are very simple. This idea of a lack of creativity and mere simplicity shows how these expectations have been imposed upon the daughter for so long that she feels as if she can no longer fight it, there's a simple answer and that answer is to conform. Additionally, the sentences are very clear that “this” is the way to do something, not that, or another way, but there is only one way. The daughter will only be worthy to the mother once she is materially wealthy, as she is expected to be, and internally alone. The idea of a strained mother-daughter relationship is not only showcased in this essay, but showcased all across the world. Given the fact that it's been highlighted through writing shows personal experience from the author or experience from the people around her. Many times, when it becomes strained like this, it’s because the mother had these same ideals forced upon herself. Looking from a wider lense, it creates a toxic circle of strong women losing their strength as they begin to define their worth in things other than who they are. Many times, this is because if they don’t conform, society will beat them down until they have no one to support them except for themselves. At this point, it is no longer why is this mother-daughter relationship strained, and how can this mom accept her daughter’s individuality, but rather how can the expectations that society imposes upon young women change from materialism to originality.
Score Breakdown
Thesis (1/1)
Evidence & Commentary (4/4)
Sophistication (1/1)
Why This Essay Scored Well
The essay opens with a hook that most students would not think to try: a set of cooking instructions, then the question of what happens when that same cookbook logic gets applied to a person. That framing carries through the whole response instead of being dropped after the introduction. The thesis names three techniques, active voice, repetition, and sentence structure, and ties them to a claim about conformity and lost identity, which is what the rubric asks for. Each body paragraph then stays on its announced technique. The first paragraph reads the list of commands as a one-sided relationship and points out the absence of dialogue, so the lack of emotion becomes evidence, not a feeling the writer simply asserts. The repetition paragraph counts the word "don't" fourteen times and connects that count to an impossible standard of perfection. The structure paragraph quotes the run of "this is how" sentences and argues that the sameness of the phrasing shows the daughter sees only one acceptable path. The grader singled out the semicolons-as-held-breath reading and the "this is how" pattern as real analysis, not summary, and that is the pattern across all three body paragraphs: quote, then interpret. The closing question about whether society's expectations can shift from materialism to originality is the one moment that reaches past the story, and it earns the sophistication point by widening the frame only after the analysis is done.
For the full point-by-point rubric behind this score, read our AP essay rubric breakdown.
What Could Be Improved
The Vashti comparison is the boldest move in the essay, but it spends more sentences retelling the Bible story than analyzing Kincaid. Trim the plot and use those sentences to show how the mother's repeated "don't" polices the daughter the way Vashti was punished for setting a boundary. The claim that the daughter "can no longer fight it" needs textual support, and the story hands over the evidence: the daughter interrupts the commands only twice, and the first time, "but I don't sing benna on Sundays," is a moment of resistance that deserves direct analysis. The final paragraph widens to "all across the world" and loses the story, so keep the lens on Kincaid's techniques and let the universal claim grow out of that evidence. The word "materialism" is asserted but never shown in the text, so either ground it in a specific line or drop it.
Ready to improve your own essay? Grade your AP English Literature essay free with AI.


