4/6 AP English Literature Prose Essay Example #2
This is a real, anonymized prose essay written by an AP student and scored 4/6 by our AI grader — one of many AP English Literature essay examples in our library.
The Prompt
The following excerpt is from Brenda Peynado's short story "The Rock Eaters," published in 2021. In this passage, the narrator is one of a group of people who left their home country after developing the ability to fly, an ability that is accepted as realistically possible within the story. Years later, the group returns to that country with their children. Read the passage carefully. Then, in a well-written essay, analyze how Peynado uses literary elements and techniques to convey the narrator's complex experience of this return home.
The Passage
The Essay
In The Rock Eaters by Brenda Peynado, the author uses comparisons and vivid descriptions to show the guilt experienced by the narrator returning home, which ultimately emphasizes that nothing is more valuable than one’s true home. Throughout the excerpt, several comparisons are made across the poem which show the narrator’s guilt at what they gave up while away from their home. When the narrator returns home, they have “suitcases packed with gifts from abroad” compared to their parents who live in “houses with no electricity.” This contrast between the vast wealth of the narrator’s family compared to the poverty of those in their home country makes the narrator feel like they have a “suspect stench.” Their old neighbors don’t like how much more prosperous they are due to their ability to fly - they view it as a “betrayal” to leave them behind in impoverished conditions. They show this anger through hosting “celebrations we’d not been invited to” and making the narrator “beg to be let back into” country clubs. This disparity therefore makes the narrator feel guilty about returning home and flaunting their new wealth such as through having a huge amount of gifts. Another comparison within the excerpt is a cultural one between the narrator’s children and those born here. The narrator says that they “[showed] ours how to eat cajuilitos solimán and acerolas from the branch.” The narrator’s children, being born abroad, do not know the unique, rich culture that they belong to. This exposure makes the narrator proud, but it also makes them reflect on how they had “never talked to them of history.” This shows the guilt which the narrator faces upon returning home. While they are happy that they are eventually welcomed back into their community, they also realize that they had given up many parts of their identity in order to live abroad. This doesn’t cause them to regret their actions but instead to embrace their true home and realize that though they may have more material wealth than the other islanders, nothing is more valuable than their shared culture. Along with comparisons, Peynado uses vivid descriptions to show the guilt experienced by the narrator returning home. When describing their landing, the narrator says they were “denting cars, squashing flowers, rattling windows.” Returning home is typically described as an exciting, heart-filled moment with old family members and friends waiting for arrival. However, the narrator portrays their return as a disturbance by discussing the property they damaged and even the flowers they trampled. Flowers are symbolic of beauty and liveliness, and so for the well-meaning visitors to displace these flowers suggests their ironic harm towards the community. Because the story is told through the first-person view of the narrator, this vivid description shows their own focus on the negative impacts of their arrival and therefore the guilt that they have. Next, the narrator details the seemingly mundane yet unique aspects of their home. They show their children the “coral red spilling in the dirt”, the “glimmering pebbles,” and the “red dust that stained the seats of their best clothes.” These vividly fond descriptions show the narrator’s love for parts of their community which most people, including their children, who were born abroad, would not care for. The dirt is imbued with a vibrant red colour, and the pebbles, denoting small stature, are glimmering to show their natural beauty. Additionally, the narrator is fond of their children having stains on their best clothes even though it’s a nuisance to clean because it’s an experience unique to this community. The portrayal of these minute features as beautiful and significant shows how the narrator’s guilt at leaving their home for so long is amplified by the realization that they had been missing so many experiences which created them. This ultimately emphasizes that nothing is more valuable than one’s true home.
Score Breakdown
Thesis (1/1)
Evidence & Commentary (3/4)
Sophistication (0/1)
Why This Essay Scored Well
The thesis names specific techniques and makes a defensible claim about guilt and the value of home. The essay connects the wealth contrast to the narrator's shame, a clear link between evidence and the guilt claim. The evidence choice is strong: the violent verbs undercut the expected joyful return and support the disturbance reading. The writer explains how the flower image works to reveal harm, which is the kind of device-to-meaning analysis the rubric rewards. The move from vivid detail to the narrator's sense of lost identity is an insightful connection to the thesis. The cultural comparison is a genuinely original observation that extends the argument beyond the obvious.
For the full point-by-point rubric behind this score, read our AP essay rubric breakdown.
What Could Be Improved
The evidence commentary needs to push past summary. Instead of saying a quote shows guilt, the essay should explain the mechanism: how does the contrast between suitcases packed with gifts and houses with no electricity actually produce the narrator's feeling of a suspect stench? The narrator both loves this home and no longer fits it, as shown in how little the place fit us anymore. The argument treats the return as simply embracing home, which flattens the complexity the prompt asks about. The devices should tie back to a single line of reasoning. The essay names comparisons and vivid descriptions but does not show how they build one argument about the narrator's ambivalent experience.
Ready to improve your own essay? Grade your AP English Literature essay free with AI.

