FRQuick

4/6 AP English Literature Literary Argument Essay Example #1

This is a real, anonymized literary argument essay written by an AP student and scored 4/6 by our AI grader — one of many AP English Literature essay examples in our library.

The Prompt

Many works of literature depict a conflict between the old and the new: Old worlds, old ways or old values clash with newer ones. Either from your own reading or from the following list, choose a work of fiction in which there is marked tension between the old and the new. Then, in a well-written essay, anlyze how the tension between the old and the new contributes to an interpretation of the work as a whole.

The Essay

In the book The Pearl by John Steinbeck, there is tension between the old world, the native people who desire to live happy lives using only what they need, and the new world, the townspeople who hold the belief that the native people are inferior. Throughout the text we can see as Kino slowly starts to change his beliefs, and begin to desire to live more like the townspeople. The pearl gives Kino a connection to the new world, but the new world’s greed corrupts Kino, eventually leading to many of his misfortunes throughout the book. In an early chapter in the story, Kino’s child is stung by a scorpion.This is the first time that a townsperson treats Kino unfairly because of his status. The doctor in Kino’s town refuses to treat Kino’s baby. Kino realizes that he can’t protect his family because of his poverty. When Kino finds the pearl he realizes that he is now capable of providing for his family. The doctor’s actions are the first example of Kino’s connection to the new world. His actions are important, because it gives us a contrast of the way townspeople treat Kino before vs. after he finds the pearl. For example, after the pearl has been found, the doctor is more than willing to treat Kino’s son. Additionally the priest comes and visits Kino in his home. He reminds them that they must pay the church, but he also offers to marry Juana and Kino in the church. The Priest and Doctor both visiting Kino in his home highlights the difference of treatment towards Kino, now that he has the pearl. Before the pearl, townspeople would never have visited Kino in his home. Kino, now, has something they want, so they deign to enter his home. Their change in behavior illustrates their greed: since before he has the pearl they don’t want to even speak with him adn after they are willing to take time out oftheir day to come and visit him in his own home. They are only willing to do this because of the pearl, which demonstrates their lack of care for people who are less fortunate than them. Additionally, this highlights their focus on material things. Their greed reflects onto Kino as he realizes that material things are what give you power in the new world. These actions from the townspeople help Kino realize that if he wants respect he must use his new found fortune to learn to live like the townspeople. He takes it a step further and begins to dream of a new life for his son where he won’t be treated poorly. He sees a future where his son can read, where Kino owns a rifle and a new harpoon, and where Juana and Kino are married. When he speaks of the future: he says he can see these things happening in the reflection of the pearl. All these things are the things that the townspeople deem important. Kino sees his family dressed in fancy clothes, but they are not the clothes the native people usually wear. He describes the United States sailor suit and a hat of fine black felt, which he thinks show him as well dressed because they are what the townspeople wear. Furthermore, being married in a church is a thing the townspeople decided has meaning, but for Kino it has no meaning except that it makes him more respectable in the eyes of the townspeople. He believes that he must strive to be like them in order to be treated as an equal, and truly give his son the life he deserves. Kino then decides that he must go and visit the buyers. The buyers, however, are greedy. They attempt to trick Kino into selling his precious pearl for less. After Kino is offered 1000 pesos, he refuses. He knows that they are offering him less than the actual value of the pearl. This is a continuation of the greed of the whites. The buyers believe they can get more from him, because he is inferior. This leads Kino to decide to venture out to the capital city in hopes of a better price. On this journey, his child dies. This is the final misfortune that the pearl causes his family. Some people might say that this is the fault of Kino for being too greedy. However, if the buyers had just offered Kino a fair price in the first place. Kino never would’ve lost his child. In conclusion, the music, the trickyness of the buyers, and the doctor treating Kino like he’s not worth his time are all what send Kino off the edge into his cascade of misfortune. All these interactions between Kino and the “new world” prove that the new world’s greed is in fact the catalyst to all of Kino’s misfortunes. Therefore greed is the catalyst for evil, because without the greed of the white’s, Kino’s son would be alive.

Score Breakdown

Thesis (1/1)

Evidence & Commentary (3/4)

Sophistication (0/1)

Why This Essay Scored Well

Most essays on this prompt stop at "the old world clashes with the new world." This one goes further. It names greed as the actual mechanism driving the story, and it holds that claim through the conclusion, arguing that greed is the catalyst for evil.

The doctor and priest paragraph carries real weight because it tracks a before-and-after. Before the pearl, the essay says, townspeople "would never have visited Kino in his home." After it, the doctor treats his son without hesitation, and the priest shows up to talk about marriage and the church tithe. The essay ties that shift straight back to greed. The townspeople, it says, are "only willing to do this because of the pearl, which demonstrates their lack of care for people who are less fortunate than them."

Kino's daydream about his son does different work. He imagines the boy in a sailor suit and a hat of fine black felt, married in a church Kino has no faith in, because, in the essay's words, "these are the things that the townspeople deem important." Here the greed has stopped being something townspeople do to Kino. It has moved inside him, into what he wants for his own son. Two moments, two different ways greed operates, both tied to the same thesis, and together they earn 3 out of 4 for evidence and commentary.

For the full point-by-point rubric behind this score, read our AP essay rubric breakdown.

What Could Be Improved

The evidence and commentary score stops at 3 out of 4 because the buyers paragraph mostly retells the plot instead of unpacking it, the way the doctor and daydream paragraphs do. The essay says the low offer "is a continuation of the greed of the whites" and moves on, without showing what in the exchange itself proves that. A stronger version would quote the buyer's exact offer and explain, sentence by sentence, why it counts as trickery and not a fair opening bid.

The sophistication point is where this essay sits furthest from earning credit. Right now the argument treats the native people as simply good and the townspeople as simply greedy. A more complicated version would ask whether Kino's own choices played a part in what happened to his family, instead of placing all the blame on greed from outside.

The conclusion brings up "the music" as a cause of Kino's misfortune, but the essay never mentions music anywhere before that sentence. Fix that, or cut it.

Ready to improve your own essay? Grade your AP English Literature essay free with AI.