FRQuick

7/7 AP World History DBQ Essay Example #1

This is a real dbq essay written by an AP student (personal details removed) and scored 7/7 by our AI grader — one of many AP World History essay examples in our library.

The Prompt

Develop an argument that evaluates the similarities and differences in the ways states were organized in different parts of the world from c. 1200 to 1450 CE.

The Essay

During the post-classical era, varying degrees of political stability in Europe led up to a decentralized Western Europe and a centralized Eastern Europe, namely the Byzantine Empire, although both were divided into different Christian churches. Meanwhile, in the Americas, different civilizations had arisen, each with unique customs and beliefs. Although many different empires and civilizations arose throughout the world, regions throughout Western Europe used the feudal system, while in the Americas, civilizations like the Maya, were independent city-states. However, both of these societies were decentralized and used a religious belief system — whether the Roman Catholic Church or divine rituals— to legitimize and maintain political authority and stability. Ultimately, although different conditions caused different government structures, the ruler needed authority to maintain stability within their rule. Within the region of Western Europe, the Holy Roman Empire was weakening and fragmenting. Although it started off using the feudal system, the lords soon consolidated more power for themselves. This is evident because in “The Golden Bull,” a decree by Emperor Chalres IV (Document 4), the emperor passed a law setting strict rules about coining money, requiring unanimous decisions by electors, banning unjust wars and feuds, and elevated the royalty visually. One can infer that the emperor passed this law to mitigate the already weakening effects on the empire and to re-establish authority to prevent the fall of the Holy Roman Empire, although this attempt was futile as it showed the emperor acknowledging the power his supposed vassals have. However, the people of this empire still had the same faith, Christianity, and were still united under the Roman Catholic Church. Their religion gave them all the same set of rules and morals to live by, the same beliefs to follow, henceforth uniting them against those of other faiths. Similarly, rulers of the Turkic Muslim Sultanates used Islam and the Shari’a law to maintain stability because the faith gave Muslims the same set of rules and customs to live by. However, the power of the Church invited a power struggle between secular and ecclesiastical authorities over who had the power to appoint bishops, namely in a conflict called the Lay Investiture Controversy. This conflict was solved with the church ultimately gaining autonomy through the agreement called the Concordat of Worms 1122. Meanwhile in the Americas, the decentralized Maya city-states were constantly at war with another to conquer more tribute lands where they may capture prisoners of war. These prisoners of war were used as religious sacrifices for those who believed in Sun God. Not only was this a religious ritual, but it also served as a symbol of power for the state’s ruler, showing how political authorities often used religion to legitimize power. Shown in the Madrid Codex (Document 7) — a Maya almanac — are religious rituals, agriculture, and astronomical observations. These served as a guide for the next ruler for how to maintain the civilization by their beliefs. However, if the population is diverse and of different faiths, this must be accounted for too to maintain peace. In an excerpt from The Travels by Marco Polo (Document 3), Polo writes about the Yuan emperor displaying respect and reverence of all religions — Christianity, Islam, Judaism, or otherwise. Clearly, he does so because as a Mongol conqueror of the previous Song Dynasty, he must respect all of his subjects to maintain unity among the diver population of China and prevent rebellion of his Mongol rule. Likewise, Mayan rulers used the religious ritual of bloodletting where they cut their skin to present their own blood to the Sun God to legitimize their power. To conclude, different environmental, political, and social conditions affect state organization. However, a similarity seen throughout all societies during this era and after it too is that religious belief systems are used to maintain stability throughout the ruled. Both the Holy Roman Empire and the Maya civilizations were decentralized and used belief systems to maintain a stable rule. The subjects of the Holy Roman Empire were all united under the Roman Catholic Church whereas the subjects of the Maya city-states all believed in the Sun god and performed the religious sacrifices, which was also a show of power for the ruler. However, the Maya city-states were independent of one another and were fighting to conquer tribute provinces. To contrast, the Holy Roman Empire used the feudal system, where the lords were vassals to the king and agreed to provide military service to the king when necessary, although this hold the king had over the lords was weakened during this time period, rapidly leading to the empire’s fall. Different regions have different conditions to contend with but still require a ruler to maintain authority. However, sometimes a ruler’s past might influence their rule, as is the case with Zhu Yuanzhang, the Hongwu Emperor and founder of the Chinese Ming Dynasty. As is seen from an edict by him (Document 6), the Yuanzhang despised the corrupt and foolish previous dynasty and is set on removing or harshly disciplining those that are corrupt and foolish. This suggests that he did this to maintain political stability and authority within his empire, similar to how other societies used belief systems.

Score Breakdown

Thesis (1/1)

Contextualization (1/1)

Evidence from Documents (2/2)

Evidence Beyond Documents (1/1)

Sourcing (1/1)

Complexity (1/1)

Why This Essay Scored Well

The introduction sets up two claims at once. The writer contrasts feudal Western Europe with the Maya city-states, then argues that both used religion to hold power, and closes on the line that "the ruler needed authority to maintain stability within their rule." That gives each body paragraph something to prove. The opening sentences about a fragmented West, a centralized Byzantine Empire, and a split between Christian churches handle contextualization before any document appears.

In the second paragraph, the writer reads the Golden Bull (Document 4) as a sign of weakness. The emperor's attempt was futile, the essay says, because "it showed the emperor acknowledging the power his supposed vassals have." That inference about why the decree was issued also earns the sourcing point. The third paragraph does the same work in a different region. The writer explains that the Yuan emperor honored every faith because, as a Mongol ruling Chinese subjects, "he must respect all of his subjects to maintain unity." Two documents from two regions each carry a claim about why a ruler acted, so the evidence holds up across the essay.

For evidence beyond the documents, the essay names the Lay Investiture Controversy and the Concordat of Worms, explains that the fight was over who could appoint bishops, and ties it back to the power of the Church inside the Holy Roman Empire.

The complexity point works differently from the others, because it comes from one move in the third paragraph. After arguing that shared religion kept rulers in power, the writer stops to test that claim. "However, if the population is diverse and of different faiths, this must be accounted for too to maintain peace." The Yuan example then shows a ruler keeping stability by tolerating many faiths, which bends the thesis without breaking it.

For the full point-by-point rubric behind this score, read our AP essay rubric breakdown.

What Could Be Improved

The Golden Bull of 1356 had a majority of the seven electors choose the emperor, so "requiring unanimous decisions by electors" gets the decree backwards. The conclusion says the empire was rapidly falling, but the Holy Roman Empire lasted until 1806. The Concordat of Worms in 1122 was a compromise that left the emperor a role in investing bishops with their lands, so "gaining autonomy" overstates what the church won. And the Maya did not sacrifice captives to one Sun God. They made offerings to many gods, and rulers let their own blood for gods and ancestors alike.

The Madrid Codex gets a list of contents, but the essay never says which ritual or observation guided a ruler, so the claim that the almanac "served as a guide for the next ruler" has nothing under it. The Turkic Muslim Sultanates get one sentence with no named sultanate or law. The Hongwu edict arrives in the last lines of the conclusion, where the writer has no room to show how a ruler's past "might influence their rule" in practice.

Ready to improve your own essay? Grade your AP World History essay free with AI.